Our Team
We have a fantastic team at Molloy Hucker, with a raft of expertise and experience.
Meet more of the team here.
Testimonials
“Gerard's particular skill is being able to simplify the law, communicating with people across a broad spectrum, combined with entrepreneurial flair.
He leads from the front gathering people’s admiration and respect along the way.”
John Munro, Barrister
“I’ve worked in conjunction with Gerard for over 10 years, in several businesses and with multiple types of legal requirements.
Gerard possesses an exceptional ability as a lawyer and business acumen. I appreciated his honest and forthright support. That does not mean I heard what I wanted to hear at all times – I got his best advice…”
Simon Gordon, GM Acton International
"Nathan proved to be an indispensable asset to our company when we recently faced a complex commercial matter. His invaluable advice and support were instrumental in ensuring a successful outcome, and his guidance through a difficult process made all the difference. Furthermore, Nathan consistently demonstrates his expertise in handling employment-related matters for us with great proficiency and balance, making him a trusted and reliable advisor in these areas."
Matthew Nye-Hingston, CEO
“I’ve trusted Gerard for the past 15 years with some of the most important decisions in my life. I recommend to anyone reading this: You should do the same.”
Jamie McKean, Client
"Molloy Hucker has offered invaluable guidance in making some of the most important decisions of my life… I trust Gerard and believe that he's personally invested in the success of any and all advice that he gives to those he works with.”
Victor Green, Flight Digital
Nathan is a first class lawyer with excellent analytical and advocacy skills. I would highly recommend him.
Phill Rice, Barrister
“Every now and then someone comes along and the boundaries of a profession are pushed outwards to a better place.
Gerard is that someone for the legal profession…”
Andrew Clark, GM Pitstop
“Gerard is the only lawyer I’ve ever met who didn’t leave me feeling slightly soiled by the experience. He’s entertaining, disarmingly honest and very, very good at what he does. Cross him at your peril.”
Matthew Masters, Advertising Executive
"Would like to say thank you for all of your help and support throughout this process and getting the best possible outcome for myself and family.
It was a pleasure to have Nathan represent me."
“Gerard is charismatic, fun and engaging. He is a commercially astute, pragmatic, lateral thinking problem-solver. He brings cut-through.”
Clinton Lawgun, Client
“Gerard is a rare human being. His razor-sharp legal brain is matched by an infinite level of empathy, a galloping wit and an ability to ‘hold a room’ like no other I have met.”
David Pretorius, Jarden
"Gerard is a Gem. He has been a massive support to us in terms of conveyancing and general legal matters. We love his jovial, down-to-earth, and relatable style. His ethos and approach to life is hugely refreshing, and he always has a great story to tell…
We highly recommend Molloy Hucker to all sensible human beings.”
Robyn Ellson, Ray White
“Gerard is a natural leader. He captains the ship and gives a rousing speech at the drop of a hat; but he also encourages others to shine.
His sharp legal mind, commercial acumen, and quick wit are second to none. He is able to tackle any legal issue that lands on his desk, quickly distill the issue, and solve it pragmatically. His negotiation skills are an art form and he is universally liked and revered by staff, clients… and even opposing counsel.”
Rochelle Stevens, Lawyer
“He always makes you feel relaxed no matter what the legal situation is. His humour is infectious. He is a very knowledgeable lawyer and is enjoyable to deal with.”
Joan Thomas, client
“Gerard's legal services are always more than legal services. He has a unique ability to see the bigger picture of what you’re wanting to achieve, allowing him to ask the right questions and provide the best advice and recommendations.
Nick Carroll, Client
“Gerard’s the sort of man who inspires trust from the instant you first meet him. Infectious energy, refreshingly straight-talking and with an endless generosity of spirit. The world needs more people like him.”
Ian Howard, Bright Street Studios
“Gerard's particular skill is being able to simplify the law, communicating with people across a broad spectrum, combined with entrepreneurial flair.
He leads from the front gathering people’s admiration and respect along the way.”
John Munro, Barrister
“I’ve worked in conjunction with Gerard for over 10 years, in several businesses and with multiple types of legal requirements.
Gerard possesses an exceptional ability as a lawyer and business acumen. I appreciated his honest and forthright support. That does not mean I heard what I wanted to hear at all times – I got his best advice…”
Simon Gordon, GM Acton International
"Nathan proved to be an indispensable asset to our company when we recently faced a complex commercial matter. His invaluable advice and support were instrumental in ensuring a successful outcome, and his guidance through a difficult process made all the difference. Furthermore, Nathan consistently demonstrates his expertise in handling employment-related matters for us with great proficiency and balance, making him a trusted and reliable advisor in these areas."
Matthew Nye-Hingston, CEO
“I’ve trusted Gerard for the past 15 years with some of the most important decisions in my life. I recommend to anyone reading this: You should do the same.”
Jamie McKean, Client
"Molloy Hucker has offered invaluable guidance in making some of the most important decisions of my life… I trust Gerard and believe that he's personally invested in the success of any and all advice that he gives to those he works with.”
Victor Green, Flight Digital
Nathan is a first class lawyer with excellent analytical and advocacy skills. I would highly recommend him.
Phill Rice, Barrister
“Every now and then someone comes along and the boundaries of a profession are pushed outwards to a better place.
Gerard is that someone for the legal profession…”
Andrew Clark, GM Pitstop
“Gerard is the only lawyer I’ve ever met who didn’t leave me feeling slightly soiled by the experience. He’s entertaining, disarmingly honest and very, very good at what he does. Cross him at your peril.”
Matthew Masters, Advertising Executive
"Would like to say thank you for all of your help and support throughout this process and getting the best possible outcome for myself and family.
It was a pleasure to have Nathan represent me."
“Gerard is charismatic, fun and engaging. He is a commercially astute, pragmatic, lateral thinking problem-solver. He brings cut-through.”
Clinton Lawgun, Client
“Gerard is a rare human being. His razor-sharp legal brain is matched by an infinite level of empathy, a galloping wit and an ability to ‘hold a room’ like no other I have met.”
David Pretorius, Jarden
"Gerard is a Gem. He has been a massive support to us in terms of conveyancing and general legal matters. We love his jovial, down-to-earth, and relatable style. His ethos and approach to life is hugely refreshing, and he always has a great story to tell…
We highly recommend Molloy Hucker to all sensible human beings.”
Robyn Ellson, Ray White
“Gerard is a natural leader. He captains the ship and gives a rousing speech at the drop of a hat; but he also encourages others to shine.
His sharp legal mind, commercial acumen, and quick wit are second to none. He is able to tackle any legal issue that lands on his desk, quickly distill the issue, and solve it pragmatically. His negotiation skills are an art form and he is universally liked and revered by staff, clients… and even opposing counsel.”
Rochelle Stevens, Lawyer
“He always makes you feel relaxed no matter what the legal situation is. His humour is infectious. He is a very knowledgeable lawyer and is enjoyable to deal with.”
Joan Thomas, client
“Gerard's legal services are always more than legal services. He has a unique ability to see the bigger picture of what you’re wanting to achieve, allowing him to ask the right questions and provide the best advice and recommendations.
Nick Carroll, Client
“Gerard’s the sort of man who inspires trust from the instant you first meet him. Infectious energy, refreshingly straight-talking and with an endless generosity of spirit. The world needs more people like him.”
Ian Howard, Bright Street Studios
“Gerard's particular skill is being able to simplify the law, communicating with people across a broad spectrum, combined with entrepreneurial flair.
He leads from the front gathering people’s admiration and respect along the way.”
John Munro, Barrister
Our services
We use our 30 years of legal expertise to provide effective and efficient solutions to your personal and business related legal matters.
Molloy Hucker is different in that we approach all matters with a focus on people first by making the legal process as clear and transparent as possible.
Significant Judgments
We’ve been helping businesses solve their legal problems for over 30 years. By working closely with our clients, we look to provide the best possible solution to the problem at hand. No matter how complicated your issues may seem, seeking our advice early on can make all the difference.
Toilolo v Registrar of Companies
Third successful appeal from a decision of the Registrar of Companies where Court held that period of bankruptcy (and automatic disqualification during that period) should not be extended by delaying the processes of director disqualification by the Registrar of Companies and affirmed the policy principles behind the disqualification regime.
Maginness v Tiny Town Projects Limited (in liq) [2023] NZHC 494
Acting for a debt factoring company in a claim for monies held by the liquidators of tiny homes builder. The proceedings concerned broader issues as to whether equitable liens take priority over security interests in goods.
Birdwood Rodney Trustee Ltd v Blue Moon Limited [2022] NZHC 23
Successful application for orders that a caveat on a property not lapse. The main issue was whether an agreement for the sale of purchase remained on foot and whether valid notice for the cancellation of the agreement had been issued by the vendor.
Robertson Bixley Limited v Lisa Jolly [2022] NZHC 286
Successful opposition to an application to set aside a bankruptcy notice served on a judgment debtor, where it was held the existence of an instalment order following a financial assessment hearing in the District Court did not operate as a stay of bankruptcy proceedings - distinguishing the long-established rule of Telke v Williamson (1996) 9 PRNZ 658.
Concrete Structures Limited v NMHB Limited (in liquidation) [2020] NZHC 1218
Successful application on behalf of liquidators requiring a law firm to produce trust account receipts for the receipt and disbursement of company funds. Now the leading authority on the principles relevant to the exercise of the discretion to make an order requiring the production of documents relating to a company in liquidation.
Cooper v Debut Homes & Ors [2019] NZCA 39
Supreme Court Judgment as to requirements for breach of directors duties and remedies/compensation for breaches of directors duties. Guidance as to responsibilities of directors to take account of creditors and obligations of the Company and where a director is personally liable for the debts incurred by a company. Dealt with ability of Courts to set aside securities for parties related to the Company even where no other funding would have been available. Precursor to the Mainzeal judgments.
Finnigan v Ellis [2018] 2 NZLR 123
Rejection of Australian approach of requiring director of liquidated companies to provide personal financial information about the director to assess the ability of a director to meet any judgment that may be sought by the Liquidators. Confirmed that Privacy principles limited the application of Liquidators Powers including NZ Bill of Rights against unreasonable search and seizure. Guidance as to documents Liquidators entitled to seek as of right from director or third parties and those requiring Court Orders.
Erceg v Erceg [2017] 1 NZLR 320
Trustee Duties and the obligations or requirements of a trustee to release information to a beneficiary of a trust. Considered whether bankruptcy of a beneficiary precluded the provision of information and what was required for an accounting. Subsequently amendments to the Tristee Act 1956 led to the enactment of the Trust Act 2019. Lead judgment on Trustee obligations relating to release if information.
Allied Concrete Ltd v Meltzer [2016] 1 NZLR 141
Supreme Court Judgment as to priority to be provided to suppliers or contractors where no knowledge or reasonable grounds to suspect insolvency of Company at time of supply. Industry and broader commercial significance holding a defence available where no knowledge or reasonable grounds to suspect insolvency even where the payment by the Company had preferential effect and was to discharge the original or earlier debt of the Company to the Contractor/Supplier.
Mani v Registrar of Companies [2016] NZHC 3002
First successful appeal from the decision of the Registrar of Companies to disqualify or prohibit a director from continuing to act as a director. Considered the policy behind the disqualification regime and its application to disqualification proceedings initiated by the Registrar of Companies.
Frimley Estate Ltd v Fog [2015] NZCCLR 14
Application for relief under former Securities Act which was superseded by the Financial Markets Conduct Act. Dealing with the status of subscriptions provided by investors and instances of non-compliance by promoters of an investment scheme based out of Hastings involving property development.
Rees v Firth [2012] 1 NZLR 408
Construction Contracts Act Case considering the ability to obtain an adjudication in bankruptcy and otherwise the status of an Adjudicators award under the Construction Contracts Act and the susceptibility to set aside such awards by way of judicial review.
Lane v Scenic Ocean Ltd (in liq) [2011] NZCA 339
Reciprocal Enforcement of Judgments Act considered in the context a Hong Kong Judgment obtained by default and the registration processes available or other means available to enforce judgments obtained in an overseas jurisdiction.
Nichibo Trading Company New Zealand Ltd v Lucich [2011] NZCCLR 31
Judgment concerning the PPSA and the requirements for establishing “ordinary course of business” exception.
Mrs C v The Teacher Registration Board [2000] DCR 803
Appeal from Teachers Registration Board [now succeeded by Teachers Council] from decision to cancel the registration of a teacher following criminal conviction for dishonesty offences. Identified procedural errors and other aspects of the Teachers Registration Board processes.
Toilolo v Registrar of Companies
Third successful appeal from a decision of the Registrar of Companies where Court held that period of bankruptcy (and automatic disqualification during that period) should not be extended by delaying the processes of director disqualification by the Registrar of Companies and affirmed the policy principles behind the disqualification regime.
Maginness v Tiny Town Projects Limited (in liq) [2023] NZHC 494
Acting for a debt factoring company in a claim for monies held by the liquidators of tiny homes builder. The proceedings concerned broader issues as to whether equitable liens take priority over security interests in goods.
Birdwood Rodney Trustee Ltd v Blue Moon Limited [2022] NZHC 23
Successful application for orders that a caveat on a property not lapse. The main issue was whether an agreement for the sale of purchase remained on foot and whether valid notice for the cancellation of the agreement had been issued by the vendor.
Robertson Bixley Limited v Lisa Jolly [2022] NZHC 286
Successful opposition to an application to set aside a bankruptcy notice served on a judgment debtor, where it was held the existence of an instalment order following a financial assessment hearing in the District Court did not operate as a stay of bankruptcy proceedings - distinguishing the long-established rule of Telke v Williamson (1996) 9 PRNZ 658.
Concrete Structures Limited v NMHB Limited (in liquidation) [2020] NZHC 1218
Successful application on behalf of liquidators requiring a law firm to produce trust account receipts for the receipt and disbursement of company funds. Now the leading authority on the principles relevant to the exercise of the discretion to make an order requiring the production of documents relating to a company in liquidation.
Cooper v Debut Homes & Ors [2019] NZCA 39
Supreme Court Judgment as to requirements for breach of directors duties and remedies/compensation for breaches of directors duties. Guidance as to responsibilities of directors to take account of creditors and obligations of the Company and where a director is personally liable for the debts incurred by a company. Dealt with ability of Courts to set aside securities for parties related to the Company even where no other funding would have been available. Precursor to the Mainzeal judgments.
Finnigan v Ellis [2018] 2 NZLR 123
Rejection of Australian approach of requiring director of liquidated companies to provide personal financial information about the director to assess the ability of a director to meet any judgment that may be sought by the Liquidators. Confirmed that Privacy principles limited the application of Liquidators Powers including NZ Bill of Rights against unreasonable search and seizure. Guidance as to documents Liquidators entitled to seek as of right from director or third parties and those requiring Court Orders.
Erceg v Erceg [2017] 1 NZLR 320
Trustee Duties and the obligations or requirements of a trustee to release information to a beneficiary of a trust. Considered whether bankruptcy of a beneficiary precluded the provision of information and what was required for an accounting. Subsequently amendments to the Tristee Act 1956 led to the enactment of the Trust Act 2019. Lead judgment on Trustee obligations relating to release if information.
Allied Concrete Ltd v Meltzer [2016] 1 NZLR 141
Supreme Court Judgment as to priority to be provided to suppliers or contractors where no knowledge or reasonable grounds to suspect insolvency of Company at time of supply. Industry and broader commercial significance holding a defence available where no knowledge or reasonable grounds to suspect insolvency even where the payment by the Company had preferential effect and was to discharge the original or earlier debt of the Company to the Contractor/Supplier.
Mani v Registrar of Companies [2016] NZHC 3002
First successful appeal from the decision of the Registrar of Companies to disqualify or prohibit a director from continuing to act as a director. Considered the policy behind the disqualification regime and its application to disqualification proceedings initiated by the Registrar of Companies.
Frimley Estate Ltd v Fog [2015] NZCCLR 14
Application for relief under former Securities Act which was superseded by the Financial Markets Conduct Act. Dealing with the status of subscriptions provided by investors and instances of non-compliance by promoters of an investment scheme based out of Hastings involving property development.
Rees v Firth [2012] 1 NZLR 408
Construction Contracts Act Case considering the ability to obtain an adjudication in bankruptcy and otherwise the status of an Adjudicators award under the Construction Contracts Act and the susceptibility to set aside such awards by way of judicial review.
Lane v Scenic Ocean Ltd (in liq) [2011] NZCA 339
Reciprocal Enforcement of Judgments Act considered in the context a Hong Kong Judgment obtained by default and the registration processes available or other means available to enforce judgments obtained in an overseas jurisdiction.
Nichibo Trading Company New Zealand Ltd v Lucich [2011] NZCCLR 31
Judgment concerning the PPSA and the requirements for establishing “ordinary course of business” exception.
Mrs C v The Teacher Registration Board [2000] DCR 803
Appeal from Teachers Registration Board [now succeeded by Teachers Council] from decision to cancel the registration of a teacher following criminal conviction for dishonesty offences. Identified procedural errors and other aspects of the Teachers Registration Board processes.
Toilolo v Registrar of Companies
Third successful appeal from a decision of the Registrar of Companies where Court held that period of bankruptcy (and automatic disqualification during that period) should not be extended by delaying the processes of director disqualification by the Registrar of Companies and affirmed the policy principles behind the disqualification regime.
How much does it cost?
Everyone likes surprises. Except when it is a legal bill.
Our firm therefore works hard to ensure that when the invoice turns up, it is for the amount that you expected. Every legal situation is different, and they are seldom easy. So while it is not possible to prepare a price list, we've created a guide to how much it is likely to cost for us to do your legal work.
